Follow-up Observations for IceCube-170922A: Detection of Rapid Near-Infrared Variability and Intensive Monitoring of TXS 0506+056
Tomoki Morokuma, Yousuke Utsumi, Kouji Ohta, Masayuki Yamanaka, Koji, S. Kawabata, Yoshiyuki Inoue, Masaomi Tanaka, Michitoshi Yoshida, Ryosuke, Itoh, Mahito Sasada, Nozomu Tominaga, Hiroki Mori, Miho Kawabata, Tatsuya, Nakaoka, Maiko Chogi, Taisei Abe, Ruochen Huang

TL;DR
This study reports rapid near-infrared variability and intensive multi-wavelength monitoring of the blazar TXS 0506+056 following its potential association with the IceCube-170922A neutrino event, revealing significant flux changes and polarization characteristics.
Contribution
The paper provides the first detailed multi-wavelength follow-up observations of TXS 0506+056 after a neutrino detection, highlighting its variability and polarization properties.
Findings
TXS 0506+056 showed a ~1.0 mag flux variability over days.
No significant short-term variability within a day was observed.
The blazar exhibited a bluer-when-brighter trend in optical and near-infrared wavelengths.
Abstract
We present our follow-up observations to search for an electromagnetic counterpart of the IceCube high-energy neutrino, IceCube-170922A. Monitoring observations of a likely counterpart, TXS 0506+056, are also described. First, we quickly took optical and near-infrared images of 7 flat-spectrum radio sources within the IceCube error region right after the neutrino detection and found a rapid flux decline of TXS 0506+056 in Kanata/HONIR J-band data. Motivated by this discovery, intensive follow-up observations of TXS 0506+056 are continuously done, including our monitoring imaging observations, spectroscopic observations, and polarimetric observations in optical and near-infrared wavelengths. TXS 0506+056 shows a large amplitude (~1.0 mag) variability in a time scale of several days or longer, although no significant variability is detected in a time scale of a day or shorter. TXS…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
