Extended X-ray emission around FR II radio galaxies: hotspots, lobes and galaxy clusters

TL;DR

This study systematically analyzes extended X-ray emission around 35 FR II radio galaxies, identifying its origins as thermal or non-thermal, and examining its impact on hotspot detection, revealing that IC/CMB dominates in most cases.

Contribution

It provides the first comprehensive analysis of extended X-ray emission in a large sample of FR II radio galaxies, distinguishing between thermal and non-thermal origins.

Findings

Extended emission detected in ~90% of sources along the radio axis.

Hotspots confirmed in 7 sources within the 0.5-3 keV range.

IC/CMB emission is dominant in ~70% of the sample.

Abstract

We present a systematic analysis of the extended X-ray emission discovered around 35 FR II radio galaxies from the revised Third Cambridge catalog (3CR) Chandra Snapshot Survey with redshifts between 0.05 to 0.9. We aimed to (i) test for the presence of extended X-ray emission around FR II radio galaxies, (ii) investigate if the extended emission origin is due to Inverse Compton scattering of seed photons arising from the Cosmic Microwave Background (IC/CMB) or to thermal emission from an intracluster medium (ICM) and (iii) test the impact of this extended emission on hotspot detection. We investigated the nature of the extended X-ray emission by studying its morphology and compared our results with low-frequency radio observations (i.e., $\sim$150 MHz), in the TGSS and LOFAR archives, as well as with optical images from Pan-STARRS. In addition, we optimized a search for X-ray counterparts of hotspots in 3CR FR II radio galaxies. We found statistically significant extended emission ($>$3$\sigma$ confidence level) along the radio axis for $\sim$90%, and in the perpendicular direction for $\sim$60% of our sample. We confirmed the detection of 7 hotspots in the 0.5 - 3 keV. In the cases where the emission in the direction perpendicular to the radio axis is comparable to that along the radio axis, we suggest that the underlying radiative process is thermal emission from ICM. Otherwise, the dominant radiative process is likely non-thermal IC/CMB emission from lobes. We found that non-thermal IC/CMB is the dominant process in $\sim$70% of the sources in our sample, while thermal emission from the ICM dominates in $\sim$15% of them.