Intersecting and $2$-intersecting hypergraphs with maximal covering number: the Erd\H{o}s-Lov\'asz theme revisited
J\'anos Bar\'at

TL;DR
This paper investigates the minimal size of intersecting hypergraphs with maximal covering number, providing new exact results for small uniformities, uniqueness of extremal examples, and exploring special cases like projective planes and biplanes.
Contribution
It establishes new minimal edge counts for uniformities 4 and 5, proves uniqueness of extremal hypergraphs for certain cases, and analyzes special geometric configurations.
Findings
Unique extremal hypergraph for uniformity 4
Exact minimal edges for uniformity 5 is 13 with 3 examples
Only 3 of 18 known biplanes are extremal
Abstract
Erd\H{o}s and Lov\'asz noticed that an -uniform intersecting hypergraph with maximal covering number, that is , must have at least edges. There has been no improvement on this lower bound for 45 years. We try to understand the reason by studying some small cases to see whether the truth lies very close to this simple bound. Let denote the minimum number of edges in an intersecting -uniform hypergraph. It was known that and . We obtain the following new results: The extremal example for uniformity 4 is unique. Somewhat surprisingly it is not symmetric by any means. For uniformity 5, , and we found 3 examples, none of them being some known graph. We use both theoretical arguments and computer searches. In the footsteps of Erd\H{o}s and Lov\'asz, we also consider the special case, when the hypergraph is part of a finite…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
