Senescence, change, and competition: when the desire to pick one model harms our understanding
Andr\'e C. R. Martins

TL;DR
This paper argues that focusing on a single model to explain aging hampers understanding, and suggests that considering multiple models and environmental factors provides a more comprehensive view of why we age.
Contribution
It introduces an evolutionary model emphasizing locality and environmental change, challenging the idea of a single explanatory model for aging.
Findings
Environmental change weakens group benefits in aging.
Multiple models collectively contribute to understanding aging.
Locality and temporal dynamics are key factors in aging evolution.
Abstract
The question of why we age is a fundamental one. It is about who we are, and it also might have critical practical aspects as we try to find ways to age slower. Or to not age at all. Different reasons point at distinct strategies for the research of anti-ageing drugs. While the main reason why biological systems work as they do is evolution, for quite a while, it was believed that aging required another explanation. Aging seems to harm individuals so much that even if it has group benefits, those benefits were unlikely to be enough. That has led many scientists to propose non-evolutionary explanations as to why we age. But those theories seem to fail at explaining all the data on how species age. Here, I will show that the insistence of finding the one idea that explains it all might be at the root of the difficulty of getting a full picture. By exploring an evolutionary model of aging…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
