Thurston's fragmentation and c-principles
Sam Nariman

TL;DR
This paper extends Thurston's fragmentation and c-principles to PL and contactomorphism settings, providing new variants of the Mather-Thurston theorem and connecting to non-abelian Poincaré duality.
Contribution
It generalizes Thurston's techniques to PL and contactomorphisms, answering longstanding questions and linking to non-abelian Poincaré duality via fragmentation.
Findings
New variants of Mather-Thurston theorem for PL and contactomorphisms
Thurston's fragmentation implies non-abelian Poincaré duality
Provides a compactly supported c-principle without local open ball statements
Abstract
In this paper, we generalize the original idea of Thurston for the so called Mather-Thurston's theorem for foliated bundles to prove new variants of this theorem for PL homeomorphisms, contactormorphisms. These versions answer questions posed by Gelfand -Fuks and Greenberg on PL foliations and Rybicki on contactomorphisms. The interesting point about the original Thurston's technique compared to the better known Segal-McDuff's proof of the Mather-Thurston theorem is that it gives a compactly supported c-principle theorem without knowing the relevant local statement on open balls. In the appendix, we show that Thurston's fragmentation implies the non-abelian Poincare duality theorem and its generalization using blob complexes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
