Quantum Combinatorial Games: Structures and Computational Complexity
Kyle Burke, Matthew Ferland, Shang-Hua Teng

TL;DR
This paper investigates how quantum-inspired moves affect the structure and computational complexity of combinatorial games, revealing both increased complexity and potential collapses in complexity classes.
Contribution
It introduces a standardized framework for quantum combinatorial games and analyzes their complexity, showing how quantum moves can both increase and decrease computational difficulty.
Findings
Quantum moves can make some polynomial-time games intractable.
Quantum extensions can reduce the complexity of PSPACE-complete games.
Quantum superpositions significantly alter game outcome classes and strategies.
Abstract
Recently, a standardized framework was proposed for introducing quantum-inspired moves in mathematical games with perfect information and no chance. The beauty of quantum games-succinct in representation, rich in structures, explosive in complexity, dazzling for visualization, and sophisticated for strategic reasoning-has drawn us to play concrete games full of subtleties and to characterize abstract properties pertinent to complexity consequence. Going beyond individual games, we explore the tractability of quantum combinatorial games as whole, and address fundamental questions including: Quantum Leap in Complexity: Are there polynomial-time solvable games whose quantum extensions are intractable? Quantum Collapses in Complexity: Are there PSPACE-complete games whose quantum extensions fall to the lower levels of the polynomial-time hierarchy? Quantumness Matters: How do outcome…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
