Corpora Compared: The Case of the Swedish Gigaword & Wikipedia Corpora
Tosin P. Adewumi, Foteini Liwicki, Marcus Liwicki

TL;DR
This study compares Swedish language embeddings from Gigaword and Wikipedia corpora, revealing that corpus quality and domain coverage significantly influence embedding performance beyond mere size.
Contribution
It demonstrates that corpus source and content quality impact embedding effectiveness, challenging the assumption that larger corpora always yield better results.
Findings
Wikipedia embeddings outperform Gigaword embeddings in analogy tests
Corpus quality and domain coverage affect embedding performance
Size alone does not determine embedding quality
Abstract
In this work, we show that the difference in performance of embeddings from differently sourced data for a given language can be due to other factors besides data size. Natural language processing (NLP) tasks usually perform better with embeddings from bigger corpora. However, broadness of covered domain and noise can play important roles. We evaluate embeddings based on two Swedish corpora: The Gigaword and Wikipedia, in analogy (intrinsic) tests and discover that the embeddings from the Wikipedia corpus generally outperform those from the Gigaword corpus, which is a bigger corpus. Downstream tests will be required to have a definite evaluation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling · Wikis in Education and Collaboration
