Wasserstein-based fairness interpretability framework for machine learning models
Alexey Miroshnikov, Konstandinos Kotsiopoulos, Ryan Franks, Arjun Ravi, Kannan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Wasserstein-based interpretability framework to measure and explain bias in machine learning models at the distribution level, utilizing transport theory and cooperative game theory for detailed bias analysis.
Contribution
It presents a novel framework combining Wasserstein metrics and transport theory to quantify and decompose model bias, incorporating fairness considerations and additivity through game theory techniques.
Findings
Effective bias quantification across sub-populations
Decomposition of bias into positive and negative contributions
Enhanced interpretability of model fairness
Abstract
The objective of this article is to introduce a fairness interpretability framework for measuring and explaining the bias in classification and regression models at the level of a distribution. In our work, we measure the model bias across sub-population distributions in the model output using the Wasserstein metric. To properly quantify the contributions of predictors, we take into account the favorability of both the model and predictors with respect to the non-protected class. The quantification is accomplished by the use of transport theory, which gives rise to the decomposition of the model bias and bias explanations to positive and negative contributions. To gain more insight into the role of favorability and allow for additivity of bias explanations, we adapt techniques from cooperative game theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsInterpretability
