Life after eruption VIII: The orbital periods of novae
I. Fuentes-Morales, C. Tappert, M. Zorotovic, N. Vogt, E. C. Puebla,, M. R. Schreiber, A. Ederoclite, L. Schmidtobreick

TL;DR
This paper reports new orbital periods for six faint novae and revises existing data, using these to update the period distribution of novae and compare it with theoretical models, highlighting gaps in understanding of angular momentum loss.
Contribution
It provides new orbital period measurements for six novae, revises previous data, and compares the observed distribution with theoretical models to identify discrepancies.
Findings
New orbital periods for six novae.
Revised periods for several old novae.
Discrepancies between observed and theoretical period distributions.
Abstract
The impact of nova eruptions on the long-term evolution of Cataclysmic Variables(CVs) is one of the least understood and intensively discussed topics in the field. Acrucial ingredient to improve with this would be to establish a large sample of post-novae with known properties, starting with the most easily accessible one, the orbitalperiod. Here we report new orbital periods for six faint novae: X Cir (3.71 h), ILNor (1.62 h), DY Pup (3.35 h), V363 Sgr (3.03 h), V2572 Sgr (3.75 h) and CQ Vel(2.7 h). We furthermore revise the periods for the old novae OY Ara, RS Car, V365Car, V849 Oph, V728 Sco, WY Sge, XX Tau and RW UMi. Using these new dataand critically reviewing the trustworthiness of reported orbital periods of old novae inthe literature, we establish an updated period distribution. We employ a binary-starevolution code to calculate a theoretical period distribution using both an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
