Estimating effective infection fatality rates during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany

TL;DR

This study analyzes how the infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in Germany varies over time, considering age distribution and underreporting, providing insights into the pandemic's mortality dynamics.

Contribution

It introduces three methods for estimating time-dependent effective IFRs, accounting for age distribution and dark figures of infections, improving understanding of COVID-19 mortality.

Findings

Effective IFRs vary over time with changing age distributions.

During initial waves, effective IFRs increased due to older age groups being more affected.

Adjusting for dark figures reduces the apparent variability in IFR estimates.

Abstract

The infection fatality rate (IFR) of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the most discussed figures in the context of this pandemic. Using German COVID-19 surveillance data and age-group specific IFR estimates from multiple international studies, this work investigates time-dependent variations in effective IFR over the course of the pandemic. Three different methods for estimating (effective) IFRs are presented: (a) population-averaged IFRs based on the assumption that the infection risk is independent of age and time, (b) effective IFRs based on the assumption that the age distribution of confirmed cases approximately reflects the age distribution of infected individuals, and (c) effective IFRs accounting for age- and time-dependent dark figures of infections. Results show that effective IFRs in Germany are estimated to vary over time, as the age distributions of confirmed cases and estimated infections are changing during the course of the pandemic. In particular during the first and second waves of infections in spring and autumn/winter 2020, there has been a pronounced shift in the age distribution of confirmed cases towards older age groups, resulting in larger effective IFR estimates. The temporary increase in effective IFR during the first wave is estimated to be smaller but still remains when adjusting for age- and time-dependent dark figures. A comparison of effective IFRs with observed CFRs indicates that a substantial fraction of the time-dependent variability in observed mortality can be explained by changes in the age distribution of infections. Furthermore, a vanishing gap between effective IFRs and observed CFRs is apparent after the first infection wave, while a moderately increasing gap can be observed during the second wave. Further research is warranted to obtain timely age-stratified IFR estimates.