Potential roots of the deep sub-barrier heavy-ion fusion hindrance phenomenon
P.W. Wen, C.J. Lin, R.G. Nazmitdinov, S.I. Vinitsky, O. Chuluunbaatar,, A.A. Gusev, A.K. Nasirov, H.M. Jia, A. Gozdz

TL;DR
This paper investigates the deep sub-barrier heavy-ion fusion hindrance phenomenon using an improved coupled-channels approach, emphasizing the importance of non-diagonal matrix elements in explaining experimental data.
Contribution
It introduces a refined coupled-channels method that accounts for previously neglected non-diagonal matrix elements, improving the interpretation of fusion hindrance phenomena.
Findings
Accurately reproduces experimental cross sections and S-factors for specific heavy-ion reactions.
Highlights the critical role of non-diagonal matrix elements in coupled-channels calculations.
Achieves good agreement with experimental data for the 12C+12C fusion reaction.
Abstract
We analyse the origin of the unexpected deep sub-barrier heavy-ion fusion hindrance in 64Ni+100Mo and 28Si+64Ni recations. Our analysis is based on the improved coupled-channels approach, implemented by means of the finite element method. With the aid of the Woods-Saxon potential the experimental cross sections and the S-factors of these reactions are remarkably well reproduced. We found that the account on the non-diagonal matrix elements of the coupling matrix, traditionally neglected in the conventional coupled-channels approaches in setting the left boundary conditions inside the potential pocket, and its minimal value are crucially important for the interpretation experimental data. Within our approach we found a good agreement with the experimental data for the S-factor of the fusion reaction 12C+12C, which has no a pronounced maximum for this system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
