Finite-energy infinite clusters without anchored expansion
G\'abor Pete, \'Ad\'am Tim\'ar

TL;DR
This paper discusses the properties of percolation clusters on nonamenable graphs, showing that certain expansion properties do not hold universally by providing a counterexample on a 4-regular tree.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the previously conjectured properties of infinite clusters do not extend to all finite energy ergodic invariant percolations, countering earlier assumptions.
Findings
Exponential decay of finite clusters in nonamenable graphs
Counterexample on the 4-regular tree showing failure of anchored expansion
Limits of previous percolation conjectures
Abstract
Hermon and Hutchcroft have recently proved the long-standing conjecture that in Bernoulli(p) bond percolation on any nonamenable transitive graph G, at any p > p_c(G), the probability that the cluster of the origin is finite but has a large volume n decays exponentially in n. A corollary is that all infinite clusters have anchored expansion almost surely. They have asked if these results could hold more generally, for any finite energy ergodic invariant percolation. We give a counterexample, an invariant percolation on the 4-regular tree.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
