Decipher the $R_{\Psi_{m}}$ correlator in search for the chiral magnetic effect in relativistic heavy ion collisions
Yicheng Feng, Jie Zhao, Hao-jie Xu, Fuqiang Wang

TL;DR
This study critically examines the $R_{ ext{\Psi}_m}$ correlator's effectiveness in detecting the chiral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions, comparing it with the $ riangle\gamma$ method and testing its robustness against background effects using simulations.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed analysis of the $R_{\Psi_m}$ observable's sensitivity to CME signals and backgrounds, challenging previous claims of its robustness and offering comparative insights with the $\triangle\gamma$ correlator.
Findings
$R_{\Psi_m}$ shows sensitivity to flow backgrounds in simulations.
The observable's ability to distinguish CME signals from backgrounds is limited.
Comparison with $\triangle\gamma$ reveals different sensitivities to background effects.
Abstract
Background: The chiral magnetic effect (CME) is extensively studied in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC and the LHC. An azimuthal correlator called was proposed to measure the CME. By observing the same and (convex) distributions from A Multi-Phase Transport (AMPT) model, by contrasting data and model as well as large and small systems and by event shape engineering (ESE), a recent preprint (arXiv:2006.04251v1) from STAR suggests that the observable is sensitive to the CME signal and relatively insensitive to backgrounds, and their Au+Au data are inconsistent with known background contributions. Purpose: We examine those claims by studying the robustness of the observable using AMPT as well as toy model simulations. We compare to the more widely used azimuthal correlator to identify…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
