Revised instellation patterns for close-in exoplanets
Mradumay Sadh

TL;DR
This paper develops a new analytical and numerical approach to accurately calculate the distribution of stellar radiation on close-in exoplanets, accounting for the star's size and limb darkening, revealing significant deviations from traditional models.
Contribution
It introduces an analytical formula and numerical methods to model insolation patterns on close-in exoplanets considering stellar size and limb darkening effects, improving accuracy over standard point-source assumptions.
Findings
Insolation at the substellar point can be up to 21% higher than standard calculations.
The substellar longitude of the terminator can extend up to 110 degrees on the nightside.
Significant deviations in insolation distribution are due to star size and limb darkening effects.
Abstract
The distribution of instellation at the top of a planet's atmosphere or surface is usually calculated using the inverse-square law of radiation. This is based on the assumption that the host star is far enough to be considered a point-sized Lambertian source. This assumption, which works well for the solar system planets and most exoplanets, must be revised for close-in exoplanets. The objective of this work is to derive accurate instellation patterns for close-in exoplanets, for which the effects of the spherical shape of the star must be taken into account. First an analytical formula of the insolation as a function of latitude was derived, taking the star and the planet as 3-D bodies, and incorporating the limb darkening effects of the star. Then numerical techniques were used to compute the distribution of the insolation on close-in planets as a function of latitude for a wide range…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
