Three related topics on the periodic tables of elements
Yoshiteru Maeno, Kouichi Hagino, and Takehiko Ishiguro

TL;DR
This paper reviews historical and modern periodic tables, comparing long-form, 3D helical, and nuclear periodic tables, highlighting their features, differences, and the underlying principles of element arrangement.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of various periodic table formats, including historical developments, 3D models, and nuclear-based arrangements, revealing their similarities and differences.
Findings
Long-form tables inherit Pfeiffer's arrangements.
3D helical tables recover features of Mendeleev's law.
Nuclear periodic table aligns with atomic table over two-thirds of the elements.
Abstract
A large variety of periodic tables of the chemical elements have been proposed. It was Mendeleev who proposed a periodic table based on the extensive periodic law and predicted a number of unknown elements at that time. The periodic table currently used worldwide is of a long form pioneered by Werner in 1905. As the first topic, we describe the work of Pfeiffer (1920), who refined Werner's work and rearranged the rare-earth elements in a separate table below the main table for convenience. Today's widely used periodic table essentially inherits Pfeiffer's arrangements. Although long-form tables more precisely represent electron orbitals around a nucleus, they lose some of the features of Mendeleev's short-form table to express similarities of chemical properties of elements when forming compounds. As the second topic, we compare various three-dimensional helical periodic tables that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
