Using Twitter to Analyze Political Polarization During National Crises
Parth Shisode

TL;DR
This study analyzes Twitter data to measure how national crises like hurricanes and pandemics temporarily increase political polarization between Democrats and Republicans, revealing a measurable 2.8% spike during such events.
Contribution
It demonstrates that national crises significantly elevate political polarization, providing empirical evidence of increased partisan divide during times of national stress.
Findings
A 2.8% increase in polarization during crises
Polarization spikes are consistent across different types of national events
Twitter sentiment analysis effectively captures short-term political divides
Abstract
Democrats and Republicans have seemed to grow apart in the past three decades. Since the United States as we know it today is undeniably bipartisan, this phenomenon would not appear as a surprise to most. However, there are triggers which can cause spikes in disagreements between Democrats and Republicans at a higher rate than how the two parties have been growing apart gradually over time. This study has analyzed the idea that national events which generally are detrimental to all individuals can be one of those triggers. By testing polarization before and after three events (Hurricane Sandy [2012], N. Korea Missile Test Surge [2019], COVID-19 [2020]) using Twitter data, we show that a measurable spike in polarization occurs between the Democrat and Republican party. In order to measure polarization, sentiments of Twitter users aligned to the Democrat and Republican parties are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMisinformation and Its Impacts · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Social Media and Politics
