TL;DR
This paper introduces a model-agnostic causal approach to eliminate popularity bias in recommender systems by using counterfactual inference, improving recommendation fairness without complex tuning.
Contribution
It proposes a novel cause-effect perspective and counterfactual inference method that can be integrated into existing recommenders to reduce popularity bias.
Findings
Effective in removing popularity bias across multiple datasets
Compatible with models like Matrix Factorization and LightGCN
Improves recommendation fairness and diversity
Abstract
The general aim of the recommender system is to provide personalized suggestions to users, which is opposed to suggesting popular items. However, the normal training paradigm, i.e., fitting a recommender model to recover the user behavior data with pointwise or pairwise loss, makes the model biased towards popular items. This results in the terrible Matthew effect, making popular items be more frequently recommended and become even more popular. Existing work addresses this issue with Inverse Propensity Weighting (IPW), which decreases the impact of popular items on the training and increases the impact of long-tail items. Although theoretically sound, IPW methods are highly sensitive to the weighting strategy, which is notoriously difficult to tune. In this work, we explore the popularity bias issue from a novel and fundamental perspective -- cause-effect. We identify that popularity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsLightGCN
