Pure polarization test of GW170814 and GW170817 using waveforms consistent with modified theories of gravity
Hiroki Takeda, Soichiro Morisaki, Atsushi Nishizawa

TL;DR
This study reanalyzes GW170814 and GW170817 to test for non-tensorial polarization modes, finding strong support for general relativity's tensor polarization, especially when incorporating additional prior information.
Contribution
It introduces an improved framework for pure polarization analysis of gravitational waves, including angular patterns and prior information, refining previous Bayesian model selection results.
Findings
Bayes factors strongly favor tensor polarization for GW170817 with jet prior.
Results are consistent with previous LIGO-Virgo findings but with reduced parameter bias.
Inclusion of prior information significantly enhances the support for general relativity.
Abstract
The physical degrees of freedom of a gravitational wave (GW) are imprints of the nature of gravity. We can test a gravity theory by searching for polarization modes beyond general relativity. The LIGO-Virgo collaboration analyzed several GW events in the O1 and O2 observing runs in the pure polarization framework, where they perform the Bayesian model selection between general relativity and the theory allowing only scalar or vector polarization modes. In this paper, we reanalyze the polarizations of GW170814 (binary black hole merger) and GW170817 (binary neutron star merger) in the improved framework of pure polarizations including the angular patterns of nontensorial radiation. We find logarithms of the Bayes factors of 2.775 and 3.636 for GW170814 in favor of the pure tensor polarization against pure vector and scalar polarizations, respectively. These Bayes factors are consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
