TL;DR
This paper presents an improved data-driven method to automatically discover and interpret biased concepts in word embeddings, specifically applied to language in online communities, addressing limitations of previous approaches.
Contribution
It extends previous methods to better identify and interpret biases in online community language, enabling discovery of previously undefined biased concepts.
Findings
Method effectively uncovers biased concepts in online communities.
Discovered biases are valid and stable across different datasets.
Enhanced interpretability of biased concepts in language models.
Abstract
Language carries implicit human biases, functioning both as a reflection and a perpetuation of stereotypes that people carry with them. Recently, ML-based NLP methods such as word embeddings have been shown to learn such language biases with striking accuracy. This capability of word embeddings has been successfully exploited as a tool to quantify and study human biases. However, previous studies only consider a predefined set of biased concepts to attest (e.g., whether gender is more or less associated with particular jobs), or just discover biased words without helping to understand their meaning at the conceptual level. As such, these approaches can be either unable to find biased concepts that have not been defined in advance, or the biases they find are difficult to interpret and study. This could make existing approaches unsuitable to discover and interpret biases in online…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
