Explainable Machine Learning for Public Policy: Use Cases, Gaps, and Research Directions
Kasun Amarasinghe, Kit Rodolfa, Hemank Lamba, Rayid Ghani

TL;DR
This paper examines the application of explainable machine learning in public policy, identifying key use cases, end-user needs, and gaps in current methods, and proposes research directions to enhance real-world societal impact.
Contribution
It introduces a methodology for aligning explainable ML research with specific public policy use cases and demonstrates its application in this domain.
Findings
Mapped explainable ML use cases to public policy problems
Identified gaps between current methods and real-world needs
Proposed research directions for practical impact
Abstract
Explainability is highly-desired in Machine Learning (ML) systems supporting high-stakes policy decisions in areas such as health, criminal justice, education, and employment. While the field of explainable ML has expanded in recent years, much of this work has not taken real-world needs into account. A majority of proposed methods are designed with \textit{generic} explainability goals without well-defined use-cases or intended end-users and evaluated on simplified tasks, benchmark problems/datasets, or with proxy users (e.g., AMT). We argue that these simplified evaluation settings do not capture the nuances and complexities of real-world applications. As a result, the applicability and effectiveness of this large body of theoretical and methodological work in real-world applications are unclear. In this work, we take steps toward addressing this gap for the domain of public policy.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
