A Comparison of Discrete Latent Variable Models for Speech Representation Learning
Henry Zhou, Alexei Baevski, Michael Auli

TL;DR
This paper compares two neural latent variable models, vq-vae and vq-wav2vec, for speech representation learning, finding that vq-wav2vec with future prediction performs better on phoneme recognition tasks.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison of two prominent models, highlighting the advantages of future prediction-based approaches over auto-encoding in speech tasks.
Findings
vq-wav2vec outperforms vq-vae in phoneme recognition
Best system achieves 13.22 error rate on ZeroSpeech 2019 ABX challenge
Future time-step prediction enhances speech representation quality
Abstract
Neural latent variable models enable the discovery of interesting structure in speech audio data. This paper presents a comparison of two different approaches which are broadly based on predicting future time-steps or auto-encoding the input signal. Our study compares the representations learned by vq-vae and vq-wav2vec in terms of sub-word unit discovery and phoneme recognition performance. Results show that future time-step prediction with vq-wav2vec achieves better performance. The best system achieves an error rate of 13.22 on the ZeroSpeech 2019 ABX phoneme discrimination challenge
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpeech Recognition and Synthesis · Music and Audio Processing · Natural Language Processing Techniques
MethodsVQ-VAE
