Cosmological Constraints from DES Y1 Cluster Abundances and SPT Multi-wavelength data
M. Costanzi, A. Saro, S. Bocquet, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, S., Allam, A. Amara, J. Annis, S. Avila, D. Bacon, B. A. Benson, S. Bhargava, D., Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, D. L. Burke, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J., Carretero, A. Choi, L. N. da Costa, M. E. S. Pereira

TL;DR
This paper combines DES Y1 optical cluster data with SPT multi-wavelength follow-up to improve cosmological constraints and test models of projection effects, finding consistent results and favoring a model accounting for projection contamination.
Contribution
It introduces a joint analysis of DES Y1 and SPT cluster data, testing different scatter models and demonstrating the consistency of cosmological constraints with multiple probes.
Findings
Consistent cosmological constraints from DES Y1 and SPT data.
The PRJ scatter model is favored over the BKG model.
Including SPT data mildly improves constraints and tests scatter models.
Abstract
We perform a joint analysis of the counts of redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y1 data and multi-wavelength follow-up data collected within the 2500 deg South Pole Telescope (SPT) SZ survey. The SPT follow-up data, calibrating the richness--mass relation of the optically selected redMaPPer catalog, enable the cosmological exploitation of the DES cluster abundance data. To explore possible systematics related to the modeling of projection effects, we consider two calibrations of the observational scatter on richness estimates: a simple Gaussian model which account only for the background contamination (BKG), and a model which further includes contamination and incompleteness due to projection effects (PRJ). Assuming either a CDM+ or CDM+ cosmology, and for both scatter models, we derive cosmological constraints…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
