Higher index capacities do not satisfy the symplectic Brunn-Minkowski inequality
Ely Kerman, Yuanpu Liang

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the symplectic Brunn-Minkowski inequality, valid for certain capacities, does not hold for Gutt-Hutchings capacities with index greater than one, revealing limitations of the inequality.
Contribution
It shows the failure of the symplectic Brunn-Minkowski inequality for higher index Gutt-Hutchings capacities, extending understanding of symplectic capacity inequalities.
Findings
The inequality holds for Ekeland-Hofer-Zehnder capacity.
Fails for Gutt-Hutchings capacities with index > 1.
Highlights limitations of symplectic capacity inequalities.
Abstract
In this paper we prove that the symplectic Brunn-Minkowski inequality, established by Artstein-Avidan and Ostrover for the Ekeland-Hofer-Zehnder capacity, fails to hold for the Gutt-Hutchings capacities of index greater than one.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPoint processes and geometric inequalities · Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics · Random Matrices and Applications
