Domination versus independent domination in regular graphs
Martin Knor, Riste \v{S}krekovski, Aleksandra Tepeh

TL;DR
This paper establishes an upper bound on the ratio of independent domination number to domination number in connected regular graphs, confirming a conjecture for all regular graphs with degree at least 3.
Contribution
It proves that for all connected k-regular graphs with k ≥ 3, the ratio i(G)/γ(G) is at most k/2, with equality only for complete bipartite graphs, extending previous results.
Findings
The ratio i(G)/γ(G) ≤ k/2 for all connected k-regular graphs with k ≥ 3.
Equality holds only for the complete bipartite graph K_{k,k}.
The result confirms a conjecture for all k ≥ 3, previously known only for k ≤ 6.
Abstract
A set of vertices in a graph is a dominating set if every vertex of is in or is adjacent to a vertex in . If, in addition, is an independent set, then is an independent dominating set. The domination number of is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in , while the independent domination number of is the minimum cardinality of an independent dominating set in . We prove that for all integers it holds that if is a connected -regular graph, then , with equality if and only if . The result was previously known only for . This affirmatively answers a recent question of Babikir and Henning.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
