Absence of Low-Energy Shape Coexistence in $^{80}$Ge: The Nonobservation of a Proposed Excited 0$_2^+$ Level at 639 keV
F. H. Garcia, C. Andreoiu, G. C. Ball, A. Bell, A. B. Garnsworthy, F., Nowacki, C. M. Petrache, A. Poves, K. Whitmore, F. A. Ali, N. Bernier, S. S., Bhattacharjee, M. Bowry, R. J. Coleman, I. Dillmann, I. Djianto, A. M., Forney, M. Gascoine, G. Hackman, K. G. Leach, A. N. Murphy

TL;DR
This study used high-precision gamma and beta spectroscopy to investigate the structure of $^{80}$Ge, finding no evidence for a previously proposed low-energy excited 0+ state, thus challenging the shape coexistence hypothesis.
Contribution
The paper provides the first high-statistics experimental search for the 0+2 state in $^{80}$Ge, combined with shell model calculations, to conclusively show its absence at low energy.
Findings
No evidence for the 639-keV 0+2 level in $^{80}$Ge.
Shell model predicts the 0+2 state at around 2 MeV.
Low-energy shape coexistence is unlikely in $^{80}$Ge.
Abstract
The Ge structure was investigated in a high-statistics -decay experiment of Ga using the GRIFFIN spectrometer at TRIUMF-ISAC through , -, - and - spectroscopy. No evidence was found for the recently reported 0 639-keV level suggested as evidence for low-energy shape coexistence in Ge. Large-scale shell model calculations performed in Ge place the level in Ge at 2\,MeV. The new experimental evidence combined with shell model predictions indicate that low-energy shape coexistence is not present in Ge.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
