Single Quantum Emitter Dicke Enhancement
Tommaso Tufarelli, Daniel Friedrich, Heiko Gro{\ss}, Joachim Hamm,, Ortwin Hess, Bert Hecht

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel method to enhance the coupling strength of a single quantum emitter by leveraging multiple nearly degenerate transitions, maintaining nonlinear quantum optical interactions, and aligning with recent experimental results.
Contribution
The authors propose a new approach to boost single-emitter coupling strength using multiple transitions, preserving quantum nonlinearities, and analytically demonstrate this for the case of two transitions.
Findings
Effective Jaynes-Cummings model with enhanced coupling constant of order √N.
System can replicate spectral and photon correlation features of Jaynes-Cummings physics.
Results align with recent nanoresonator experiments, enabling single-photon nonlinearities at ambient conditions.
Abstract
Coupling identical emitters to the same field mode is well-established method to enhance light matter interaction. However, the resulting boost of the coupling strength comes at the cost of a "linearized" (effectively semi-classical) dynamics. Here, we instead demonstrate a new approach for enhancing the coupling constant of a \textit{single} quantum emitter, while retaining the nonlinear character of the light-matter interaction. We consider a single quantum emitter with nearly degenerate transitions that are collectively coupled to the same field mode. We show that in such conditions an effective Jaynes-Cummings model emerges, with a boosted coupling constant of order . The validity and consequences of our general conclusions are analytically demonstrated for the instructive case . We further observe that our system can closely match the spectral line…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
