Euclid: impact of nonlinear prescriptions on cosmological parameter estimation from weak lensing cosmic shear
M. Martinelli, I. Tutusaus, M. Archidiacono, S. Camera, V.F. Cardone,, S. Clesse, S. Casas, L. Casarini, D. F. Mota, H. Hoekstra, C. Carbone, S., Ili\'c, T.D. Kitching, V. Pettorino, A. Pourtsidou, Z. Sakr, D. Sapone, N., Auricchio, A. Balestra, A. Boucaud, E. Branchini

TL;DR
Upcoming cosmological surveys like Euclid will achieve high precision in mapping large-scale structures, but nonlinear modeling uncertainties and baryonic effects can bias parameter estimates, necessitating improved theoretical prescriptions.
Contribution
This paper analyzes how different nonlinear prescriptions affect cosmological parameter estimation from Euclid-like weak lensing data, highlighting the need for better modeling of small-scale physics.
Findings
Different nonlinear models produce significantly different predictions.
Neglecting baryonic corrections causes large biases in parameters.
Improved nonlinear modeling is essential for unbiased Euclid results.
Abstract
Upcoming surveys will map the growth of large-scale structure with unprecented precision, improving our understanding of the dark sector of the Universe. Unfortunately, much of the cosmological information is encoded by the small scales, where the clustering of dark matter and the effects of astrophysical feedback processes are not fully understood. This can bias the estimates of cosmological parameters, which we study here for a joint analysis of mock Euclid cosmic shear and Planck cosmic microwave background data. We use different implementations for the modelling of the signal on small scales and find that they result in significantly different predictions. Moreover, the different nonlinear corrections lead to biased parameter estimates, especially when the analysis is extended into the highly nonlinear regime, with both the Hubble constant, , and the clustering amplitude,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
