The nature and origins of sub-Neptune size planets

TL;DR

Sub-Neptune planets are the most common exoplanets, with a bimodal radius distribution indicating different atmospheric retention histories, and their origins are linked to formation and migration processes, with atmospheric studies poised to clarify their nature.

Contribution

This paper synthesizes current understanding of sub-Neptune planets, highlighting the bimodality in their radii, potential atmospheric loss mechanisms, and formation models, emphasizing the importance of upcoming atmospheric observations.

Findings

Bimodality in radius distribution suggests two distinct populations.

Atmospheric loss mechanisms include photoevaporation and core-powered mass loss.

Future observations will clarify atmospheric compositions and origins.

Abstract

Planets intermediate in size between the Earth and Neptune, and orbiting closer to their host stars than Mercury does the Sun, are the most common type of planet revealed by exoplanet surveys over the last quarter century. Results from NASA's Kepler mission have revealed a bimodality in the radius distribution of these objects, with a relative underabundance of planets between 1.5 and 2.0 $R_{\oplus}$. This bimodality suggests that sub-Neptunes are mostly rocky planets that were born with primary atmospheres a few percent by mass accreted from the protoplanetary nebula. Planets above the radius gap were able to retain their atmospheres ("gas-rich super-Earths"), while planets below the radius gap lost their atmospheres and are stripped cores ("true super-Earths"). The mechanism that drives atmospheric loss for these planets remains an outstanding question, with photoevaporation and core-powered mass loss being the prime candidates. As with the mass-loss mechanism, there are two contenders for the origins of the solids in sub-Neptune planets: the migration model involves the growth and migration of embryos from beyond the ice line, while the drift model involves inward-drifting pebbles that coagulate to form planets close-in. Atmospheric studies have the potential to break degeneracies in interior structure models and place additional constraints on the origins of these planets. However, most atmospheric characterization efforts have been confounded by aerosols. Observations with upcoming facilities are expected to finally reveal the atmospheric compositions of these worlds, which are arguably the first fundamentally new type of planetary object identified from the study of exoplanets.