Strong Mg II and Fe II Absorbers at 2.2 < z < 6.0
Siwei Zou, Linhua Jiang, Yue Shen, Jin Wu, Eduardo Ba\~nados, Xiaohui, Fan, Luis C. Ho, Dominik A. Riechers, Bram Venemans, Marianne Vestergaard,, Fabian Walter, Feige Wang, Chris J. Willott, Ravi Joshi, Xue-Bing Wu, and, Jinyi Yang

TL;DR
This study investigates strong Mg II and Fe II absorption systems in high-redshift quasars, revealing their properties, evolution, and potential galactic associations, suggesting more disturbed environments at early cosmic times.
Contribution
First comprehensive near-IR spectroscopic survey of strong Mg II absorbers at 2.2<z<6.0, analyzing their properties, evolution, and galaxy counterparts at high redshift.
Findings
The comoving line density of these absorbers decreases at z>3.
Absorbers are less saturated and have larger velocity widths than those in lower-redshift damped Lyα systems.
Associated galaxy candidates are faint and suggest smaller, more disturbed environments at high redshift.
Abstract
We present a study of strong intervening absorption systems in the near-IR spectra of 31 luminous quasars at . The quasar spectra were obtained with {\it Gemini} GNIRS that provide continuous wavelength coverage from 0.9 to 2.5 m. We detect 32 strong Mg II doublet absorbers with rest-frame equivalent width () \AA at . Each Mg II absorber is confirmed by at least two associated Fe II absorption lines in the rest-frame wavelength range of \AA. We find that the comoving line density () of the strong Fe II-bearing Mg II absorbers decreases towards higher redshift at , consistent with previous studies. Compared with strong Mg II absorbers detected in damped Ly systems at 2 4, our absorbers are potentially less saturated and show much larger rest-frame velocity widths. This suggests…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
