Efficient Balanced Treatment Assignments for Experimentation
David Arbour, Drew Dimmery, Anup Rao

TL;DR
This paper introduces an optimal treatment assignment algorithm based on two-sample test optimization, improving experimental balance and efficacy through a novel probabilistic and transductive inference framework.
Contribution
It presents a polynomial-time optimal assignment algorithm using a two-sample test perspective and a new formulation of estimation as transductive inference.
Findings
Improved balance in treatment groups in simulations
Algorithm is optimal with respect to the minimum spanning tree test
Demonstrates enhanced efficacy over existing methods
Abstract
In this work, we reframe the problem of balanced treatment assignment as optimization of a two-sample test between test and control units. Using this lens we provide an assignment algorithm that is optimal with respect to the minimum spanning tree test of Friedman and Rafsky (1979). This assignment to treatment groups may be performed exactly in polynomial time. We provide a probabilistic interpretation of this process in terms of the most probable element of designs drawn from a determinantal point process which admits a probabilistic interpretation of the design. We provide a novel formulation of estimation as transductive inference and show how the tree structures used in design can also be used in an adjustment estimator. We conclude with a simulation study demonstrating the improved efficacy of our method.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Statistical Methods and Inference
MethodsTransductive Inference
