TL;DR
This paper addresses the challenge of increasing balance in signed networks by deleting edges within a community, proposing heuristics and greedy algorithms with theoretical guarantees, and demonstrating effectiveness on large real-world networks.
Contribution
It introduces the first study on maximizing community balance through edge deletions, providing algorithms with provable approximation bounds and empirical validation.
Findings
Algorithms effectively increase community balance.
Proposed methods scale to networks with millions of edges.
Spectral and greedy approaches outperform baselines.
Abstract
In signed networks, each edge is labeled as either positive or negative. The edge sign captures the polarity of a relationship. Balance of signed networks is a well-studied property in graph theory. In a balanced (sub)graph, the vertices can be partitioned into two subsets with negative edges present only across the partitions. Balanced portions of a graph have been shown to increase coherence among its members and lead to better performance. While existing works have focused primarily on finding the largest balanced subgraph inside a graph, we study the network design problem of maximizing balance of a target community (subgraph). In particular, given a budget and a community of interest within the signed network, we aim to make the community as close to being balanced as possible by deleting up to edges. Besides establishing NP-hardness, we also show that the problem is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
