A search for ultra high energy neutrinos from TXS 0506+056 using the Pierre Auger Observatory
The Pierre Auger Collaboration: A. Aab, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta, J.M., Albury, I. Allekotte, A. Almela, J. Alvarez-Mu\~niz, R. Alves Batista, G.A., Anastasi, L. Anchordoqui, B. Andrada, S. Andringa, C. Aramo, P.R. Ara\'ujo, Ferreira, H. Asorey, P. Assis, G. Avila, A.M. Badescu

TL;DR
This study used the Pierre Auger Observatory to search for ultra-high-energy neutrinos from the blazar TXS 0506+056, finding no detections but setting limits on neutrino fluxes during different observation periods.
Contribution
It provides the first search for ultra-high-energy neutrinos from TXS 0506+056 with the Pierre Auger Observatory and constrains neutrino flux models based on non-detections.
Findings
No neutrinos detected from TXS 0506+056.
Sensitivity limits set for different spectral indices.
Expected neutrino counts are below one for typical spectral indices.
Abstract
Results of a search for ultra-high-energy neutrinos with the Pierre Auger Observatory from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 are presented. They were obtained as part of the follow-up that stemmed from the detection of high-energy neutrinos and gamma rays with IceCube, \textit{Fermi}-LAT, MAGIC, and other detectors of electromagnetic radiation in several bands. The Pierre Auger Observatory is sensitive to neutrinos in the energy range from 100 PeV to 100 EeV and in the zenith angle range from to , where the zenith angle is measured from the vertical direction. No neutrinos from the direction of TXS 0506+056 have been found. The results were analyzed in three periods: One of 6 months around the detection of IceCube-170922A, coinciding with a flare period of TXS 0506+056, a second one of 110 days during which the IceCube collaboration found an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
