TL;DR
This paper investigates how modifications to Transformer architectures, especially cross attention, can enhance transition-based parsing performance for dependency and AMR tasks, notably with limited data.
Contribution
It introduces Transformer modifications tailored for transition-based parsing, improving performance especially in low-data scenarios.
Findings
Modified cross attention improves parsing accuracy
Transformers outperform RNNs in transition-based parsing
Enhancements are effective with smaller models and limited data
Abstract
Modeling the parser state is key to good performance in transition-based parsing. Recurrent Neural Networks considerably improved the performance of transition-based systems by modelling the global state, e.g. stack-LSTM parsers, or local state modeling of contextualized features, e.g. Bi-LSTM parsers. Given the success of Transformer architectures in recent parsing systems, this work explores modifications of the sequence-to-sequence Transformer architecture to model either global or local parser states in transition-based parsing. We show that modifications of the cross attention mechanism of the Transformer considerably strengthen performance both on dependency and Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) parsing tasks, particularly for smaller models or limited training data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsLinear Layer · Absolute Position Encodings · Position-Wise Feed-Forward Layer · Byte Pair Encoding · Softmax · Adam · Layer Normalization · Dense Connections · Multi-Head Attention · Label Smoothing
