Introducing the treatment hierarchy question in network meta-analysis
Georgia Salanti, Adriani Nikolakopoulou, Orestis Efthimou, Dimitris, Mavridis, Matthias Egger, Ian R. White

TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of a treatment hierarchy question in network meta-analysis, emphasizing the importance of clearly defining the research question and selecting appropriate ranking metrics to accurately compare treatments.
Contribution
It defines the treatment hierarchy question, discusses ranking metrics, and highlights the need to specify the research question and metric in network meta-analyses.
Findings
Different ranking metrics produce different treatment hierarchies.
Clarifying the treatment hierarchy question improves the relevance of meta-analysis results.
Protocols should specify the treatment hierarchy question and appropriate ranking metric.
Abstract
Background: Comparative effectiveness research using network meta-analysis can present a hierarchy of competing treatments, from the least to most preferable option. However, the research question associated with the hierarchy of multiple interventions is never clearly defined in published reviews. Methods and Results: We introduce the notion of a treatment hierarchy question that describes the criterion for choosing a specific treatment over one or more competing alternatives. For example, stakeholders might ask which treatment is most likely to improve mean survival by at least 2 years or which treatment is associated with the longest mean survival. The answers to these two questions are not necessarily the same. We discuss the most commonly used ranking metrics (quantities that describe or compare the estimated treatment-specific effects), how the metrics produce a treatment…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
