On the diversity of asymmetries in gapped protoplanetary disks
Nienke van der Marel (1,2), Til Birnstiel (3,4), Antonio Garufi (5),, Enrico Ragusa (6), Valentin Christiaens (7), Daniel Price (7), Steph Sallum, (8), Dhruv Muley (1), Logan Francis (1), Ruobing Dong (1) ((1) University, of Victoria, Canada, (2) Banting fellow, (3) LMU Muenchen

TL;DR
This study analyzes 16 protoplanetary disks with dust cavities, revealing how asymmetries relate to gas density and potential planetary companions, and discusses the origins of these asymmetries and their implications for planet formation.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of dust and gas structures in disks, constrains companion masses, and links spiral features to star luminosity and disk properties, advancing understanding of disk asymmetries.
Findings
Asymmetries correlate with higher Stokes numbers or low gas density.
Gas gap radii suggest companions are in brown dwarf or super-Jovian mass regimes.
Spiral arms are mainly detected around high luminosity stars with wide gaps.
Abstract
Protoplanetary disks with large inner dust cavities are thought to host massive planetary or substellar companions. These disks show asymmetries and rings in the millimeter continuum, caused by dust trapping in pressure bumps, and potentially vortices or horseshoes. The origin of the asymmetries and their diversity remains unclear. We present a comprehensive study of 16 disks for which the gas surface density profile has been constrained by CO isotopologue data. We compare the azimuthal extents of the dust continuum profiles with the local gas surface density in each disk, and find that the asymmetries correspond to higher Stokes numbers or low gas surface density. We discuss which asymmetric structures can be explained by a horseshoe, a vortex or spiral density waves. Second, we reassess the gas gap radii from the CO maps, which are about a factor 2 smaller than the dust ring…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
