Mg II and Fe II fluxes of luminous quasars at z ~ 2.7 and evaluation of the Baldwin effect in the flux-to-abundance conversion method for quasars
Hiroaki Sameshima, Yuzuru Yoshii, Noriyuki Matsunaga, Naoto Kobayashi,, Yuji Ikeda, Sohei Kondo, Satoshi Hamano, Misaki Mizumoto, Akira Arai, Chikako, Yasui, Kei Fukue, Hideyo Kawakita, Shogo Otsubo, Giuseppe Bono, Ivo Saviane

TL;DR
This study measures Fe II/Mg II flux ratios in high-redshift quasars, finds no evolution over cosmic time, and emphasizes correcting for luminosity effects like the Baldwin effect to accurately determine chemical abundances.
Contribution
It introduces a method to correct for the Baldwin effect in flux measurements, improving chemical abundance estimates in luminous quasars at high redshift.
Findings
Fe II/Mg II flux ratios show no evolution from z ~ 0.7 to 2.7.
Correcting for the Baldwin effect significantly alters abundance estimates.
Abundances after correction align with chemical evolution models.
Abstract
To investigate the chemical abundance of broad-line region clouds in quasars at high redshifts, we performed near-infrared spectroscopy of six luminous quasars at z ~ 2.7 with the WINERED spectrograph mounted on the New Technology Telescope (NTT) at the La Silla Observatory, Chile. The measured Fe II/Mg II flux ratios nearly matched with the published data for 0.7 < z < 1.6, suggesting that there is no evolution over a long period of cosmic time, which is consistent with previous studies. To derive the chemical abundances from the measured equivalent widths (EWs), their dependence on nonabundance factors must be corrected. In our previous paper, we proposed a method to derive the [Mg/Fe] abundance ratio and the [Fe/H] abundance by correcting the dependence of EW(Mg II) and EW(Fe II) on the Eddington ratio. To the best of our knowledge, that was the first report to discuss the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
