Decoding the Pre-Eruptive Magnetic Field Configurations of Coronal Mass Ejections

TL;DR

This paper reviews and synthesizes observational and modeling evidence to suggest that pre-eruptive magnetic configurations of CMEs are hybrid states evolving from sheared arcades to flux ropes, challenging the traditional dichotomy.

Contribution

It proposes that pre-eruptive magnetic fields are often hybrid configurations, evolving from sheared arcades to flux ropes, unifying previous conflicting models.

Findings

Pre-eruptive configurations can be hybrid, evolving from SMA to MFR.

Multi-viewpoint and multi-thermal observations are key to resolving configurations.

Simulations support the continuous evolution hypothesis.

Abstract

A clear understanding of the nature of the pre-eruptive magnetic field configurations of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) is required for understanding and eventually predicting solar eruptions. Only two, but seemingly disparate, magnetic configurations are considered viable; namely, sheared magnetic arcades (SMA) and magnetic flux ropes (MFR). They can form via three physical mechanisms (flux emergence, flux cancellation, helicity condensation) . Whether the CME culprit is an SMA or an MFR, however, has been strongly debated for thirty years. We formed an International Space Science Institute (ISSI) team to address and resolve this issue and report the outcome here. We review the status of the field across modeling and observations, identify the open and closed issues, compile lists of SMA and MFR observables to be tested against observations and outline research activities to close the gaps in our current understanding. We propose that the combination of multi-viewpoint multi-thermal coronal observations and multi-height vector magnetic field measurements is the optimal approach for resolving the issue conclusively. We demonstrate the approach using MHD simulations and synthetic coronal images. Our key conclusion is that the differentiation of pre-eruptive configurations in terms of SMAs and MFRs seems artificial. Both observations and modeling can be made consistent if the pre-eruptive configuration exists in a hybrid state that is continuously evolving from an SMA to an MFR. Thus, the 'dominant' nature of a given configuration will largely depend on its evolutionary stage (SMA-like early-on, MFR-like near the eruption).