Is this pofma? Analysing public opinion and misinformation in a COVID-19 Telegram group chat
Lynnette Hui Xian Ng, Loke Jia Yuan

TL;DR
This study analyzes a large Singaporean COVID-19 Telegram group to understand public opinion dynamics, sentiment, and misinformation, revealing engagement patterns and skepticism towards government-identified false information.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of public opinion, sentiment, and misinformation in a large COVID-19 Telegram group, highlighting engagement trends and skepticism towards misinformation.
Findings
Engagement peaked during alert level increases
Government misinformation was rare and skeptically received
Public sentiment and participation fluctuated over time
Abstract
We analyse a Singapore-based COVID-19 Telegram group with more than 10,000 participants. First, we study the group's opinion over time, focusing on four dimensions: participation, sentiment, topics, and psychological features. We find that engagement peaked when the Ministry of Health raised the disease alert level, but this engagement was not sustained. Second, we search for government-identified misinformation in the group. We find that government-identified misinformation is rare, and that messages discussing these pieces of misinformation express skepticism.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMisinformation and Its Impacts · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining · Public Relations and Crisis Communication
