PAC$^m$-Bayes: Narrowing the Empirical Risk Gap in the Misspecified Bayesian Regime
Warren R. Morningstar, Alexander A. Alemi, Joshua V. Dillon

TL;DR
This paper introduces PAC$^m$-Bayes, a new approach that reduces the gap caused by model misspecification in Bayesian inference, improving predictive performance with theoretical guarantees.
Contribution
It develops a multi-sample loss function that narrows the empirical risk gap in misspecified Bayesian models, with computational efficiency and PAC guarantees.
Findings
Improved predictive distribution performance in empirical tests
Theoretical PAC guarantees for the proposed loss
Effective trade-off between inferential and predictive risks
Abstract
The Bayesian posterior minimizes the "inferential risk" which itself bounds the "predictive risk". This bound is tight when the likelihood and prior are well-specified. However since misspecification induces a gap, the Bayesian posterior predictive distribution may have poor generalization performance. This work develops a multi-sample loss (PAC) which can close the gap by spanning a trade-off between the two risks. The loss is computationally favorable and offers PAC generalization guarantees. Empirical study demonstrates improvement to the predictive distribution.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference · Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods · Machine Learning and Algorithms
