TL;DR
This paper reviews the history, current state, and challenges of interpretable machine learning, emphasizing the need for rigorous definitions and addressing issues like causal interpretation and uncertainty estimation.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of IML methods, their evolution, and highlights key challenges to guide future research and application.
Findings
IML has roots dating back over 200 years in regression and rule-based models.
Many new IML methods are now available, including model-agnostic and deep learning-specific techniques.
Significant challenges remain, such as handling dependent features and establishing rigorous interpretability definitions.
Abstract
We present a brief history of the field of interpretable machine learning (IML), give an overview of state-of-the-art interpretation methods, and discuss challenges. Research in IML has boomed in recent years. As young as the field is, it has over 200 years old roots in regression modeling and rule-based machine learning, starting in the 1960s. Recently, many new IML methods have been proposed, many of them model-agnostic, but also interpretation techniques specific to deep learning and tree-based ensembles. IML methods either directly analyze model components, study sensitivity to input perturbations, or analyze local or global surrogate approximations of the ML model. The field approaches a state of readiness and stability, with many methods not only proposed in research, but also implemented in open-source software. But many important challenges remain for IML, such as dealing with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
#047 Interpretable Machine Learning - Christoph Molnar· youtube
