3-fold Massey products in Galois cohomology -- The non-prime case
Ido Efrat

TL;DR
This paper extends the understanding of 3-fold Massey products in Galois cohomology to non-prime cases, showing they are non-essential under certain conditions, using unitriangular representations.
Contribution
It generalizes previous results by proving non-essentiality of 3-fold Massey products for composite m, not just prime, via new methods involving unitriangular representations.
Findings
3-fold Massey products are non-essential for composite m
The proof applies to fields containing roots of unity of order m
Unitriangular representations are key to the argument
Abstract
For , let be a field of characteristic prime to and containing the roots of unity of order , and let be its absolute Galois group. We show that the 3-fold Massey products , with and -linearly independent, are non-essential. This was earlier proved for prime. Our proof is based on the study of unitriangular representations of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
