Are there radio-loud and radio-quiet Gamma-Ray Bursts?
Joshua Alexander Osborne, Fatemeh Bagheri, Amir Shahmoradi

TL;DR
This paper examines the proposed division of long-duration gamma-ray bursts into radio-loud and radio-quiet classes, analyzing their properties and arguing that observed differences may be due to selection effects rather than intrinsic distinctions.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that differences between radio-loud and radio-quiet LGRBs can be explained by selection effects, challenging the idea of two distinct GRB populations.
Findings
Much of the evidence for two separate classes is attributable to selection effects.
A significant positive correlation between Eiso and T90z exists in both GRB populations.
The previously observed differences in properties may not indicate intrinsic class distinctions.
Abstract
The potential existence of two separate classes of Long-duration Gamma-Ray Bursts (LGRBs) with and without radio afterglow emission, corresponding to radio-bright/loud and radio-dark/quiet populations, has been recently argued and favored in the GRB literature. The radio-quiet LGRBs have been found to have, on average, lower total isotropic gamma-ray emissions (Eiso) and shorter intrinsic prompt gamma-ray duration (e.g., T90z). In addition, a redshift-T90z anti-correlation has been discovered among the radio-loud LGRBs, which is reportedly missing in the radio-quiet class. Here we discuss the significance of the differences between the energetics and temporal properties of the two proposed classes of radio-loud and radio-quiet LGRBs. We show that much of the proposed evidence in support of the two distinct radio populations of LGRBs can be explained away in terms of selection effects…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
