TL;DR
This paper establishes a fundamental link between worst-case lattice problems and average-case $k$-SUM, proving that improving average-case $k$-SUM algorithms would lead to breakthroughs in lattice problem complexities.
Contribution
It presents the first worst-case to average-case reduction for $k$-SUM, connecting average-case complexity to lattice problems and establishing tight lower bounds.
Findings
Matching lower bounds for average-case $k$-SUM complexity
Reduction from worst-case lattice problems to average-case $k$-SUM
Implication that faster algorithms would improve lattice problem solutions
Abstract
In this work, we show the first worst-case to average-case reduction for the classical -SUM problem. A -SUM instance is a collection of integers, and the goal of the -SUM problem is to find a subset of elements that sums to . In the average-case version, the elements are chosen uniformly at random from some interval . We consider the total setting where is sufficiently large (with respect to and ), so that we are guaranteed (with high probability) that solutions must exist. Much of the appeal of -SUM, in particular connections to problems in computational geometry, extends to the total setting. The best known algorithm in the average-case total setting is due to Wagner (following the approach of Blum-Kalai-Wasserman), and achieves a run-time of . This beats the known (conditional) lower bounds for worst-case -SUM,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
On The Hardness Of Average-Case k-SUM· youtube
