
TL;DR
This paper introduces a directional Whitney inequality on compact domains in Euclidean space, analyzing the minimal number of directions needed for the inequality to hold universally across different convex bodies and domains.
Contribution
It establishes that no universal finite set of directions works for all convex bodies, but for smooth domains, a set of d independent directions suffices, and it determines the minimal number of directions needed for various classes of domains.
Findings
No universal finite set of directions exists for all convex bodies.
For smooth domains, d independent directions suffice.
The minimal number of directions is d for certain classes of domains.
Abstract
This paper studies a new Whitney type inequality on a compact domain that takes the form where denotes the -th order directional modulus of smoothness of along a finite set of directions such that , . We prove that there does not exist a universal finite set of directions for which this inequality holds on every convex body , but for every connected -domain , one can choose…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
