Modules with Non-Cyclic Socle and the Extension Property
Ali Assem Mahmoud

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which modules with non-cyclic socles satisfy the extension property, establishing the necessity of cyclic socles for certain finite module alphabets using a novel weight function approach.
Contribution
It proves that for a broad class of finite module alphabets, having a cyclic socle is necessary for the extension property, partially answering an open question.
Findings
Cyclic socle condition is necessary for the extension property in certain modules.
Introduces a new weight function to analyze the extension property.
Extends previous results on Frobenius bimodules to a wider class of modules.
Abstract
In 2009, J. Wood proved that Frobenius bimodules have the extension property for symmetrized weight compositions. More generally, it was later shown that having a cyclic socle is sufficient for satisfying the property, while the necessity remained an open question. In this thesis, a partial converse is proved. For a significant class of finite module alphabets, the cyclic socle condition is shown necessary for satisfying the extension property. The idea is to use a new weight function to return to the original case of Hamming weight.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCoding theory and cryptography · semigroups and automata theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
