A multinomial truncated D-vine copula mixed model for the joint meta-analysis of multiple diagnostic tests
Aristidis K. Nikoloulopoulos

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel joint meta-analysis model for multiple diagnostic tests using a multinomial truncated D-vine copula, allowing flexible dependence modeling and operating on the original scale of latent proportions.
Contribution
It proposes a new model that extends multinomial GLMMs with vine copulas for flexible dependence, improving analysis of multiple diagnostic tests in meta-studies.
Findings
Model alters conclusions in real data meta-analysis.
Flexible dependence structure captures complex test result relationships.
Method outperforms traditional multinomial GLMM in simulations.
Abstract
There is an extensive literature on methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic studies, but it mainly focuses on a single test. However, the better understanding of a particular disease has led to the development of multiple tests. A multinomial generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) is recently proposed for the joint meta-analysis of studies comparing multiple tests. We propose a novel model for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests, which assumes independent multinomial distributions for the counts of each combination of test results in diseased and non-diseased patients, conditional on the latent vector of probabilities of each combination of test results in diseased and non-diseased patients. For the random effects distribution of the latent proportions, we employ a truncated drawable vine copula that can cover flexible dependence structures. The proposed model includes the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
