A general framework for randomized benchmarking
Jonas Helsen, Ingo Roth, Emilio Onorati, Albert H. Werner and, Jens Eisert

TL;DR
This paper develops a comprehensive, rigorous framework for randomized benchmarking in quantum computing, enabling accurate characterization of quantum gate quality with improved data analysis and resource efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces a general theoretical framework for RB, extends analysis to realistic error models, and proposes scalable post-processing techniques for better data fitting and interpretation.
Findings
Framework encompasses all known RB protocols and new extensions
Proves conditions for RB decay behavior under realistic errors
Introduces scalable methods to improve data analysis in RB
Abstract
Randomized benchmarking (RB) refers to a collection of protocols that in the past decade have become central methods for characterizing quantum gates. These protocols aim at efficiently estimating the quality of a set of quantum gates in a way that is resistant to state preparation and measurement errors. Over the years many versions have been developed, however, a comprehensive theoretical treatment of RB has been missing. In this work, we develop a rigorous framework of RB general enough to encompass virtually all known protocols as well as novel, more flexible extensions. Overcoming previous limitations on error models and gate sets, this framework allows us, for the first time, to formulate realistic conditions under which we can rigorously guarantee that the output of any RB experiment is well-described by a linear combination of matrix exponential decays. We complement this with a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
