Abstract Congruence Criteria for Weak Bisimilarity
Stelios Tsampas, Christian Williams, Andreas Nuyts, Dominique, Devriese, Frank Piessens

TL;DR
This paper presents three compositionality criteria for operational semantics that ensure weak bisimulation is a congruence, using a coalgebraic framework and connecting to existing rule formats.
Contribution
It introduces a novel set of three criteria that, when combined, guarantee weak bisimulation congruence within a coalgebraic operational semantics framework.
Findings
Criteria successfully identify when weak bisimulation is a congruence
Examples demonstrate success and failure of criteria
Formal links to existing rule formats and lax models
Abstract
We introduce three general compositionality criteria over operational semantics and prove that, when all three are satisfied together, they guarantee weak bisimulation being a congruence. Our work is founded upon Turi and Plotkin's mathematical operational semantics and the coalgebraic approach to weak bisimulation by Brengos. We demonstrate each criterion with various examples of success and failure and establish a formal connection with the simply WB cool rule format of Bloom and van Glabbeek. In addition, we show that the three criteria induce lax models in the sense of Bonchi et al.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
