Characterizing relationships between primary miners in Ethereum by analyzing on-chain transactions
Daniel Rincon Silva

TL;DR
This paper analyzes on-chain transactions in Ethereum to reveal complex relationships and highly connected clusters among miners, challenging existing assumptions about mining centralization and informing network vulnerability assessments.
Contribution
It uncovers previously overlooked miner relationships and network structures through on-chain transaction analysis, providing a more nuanced view of Ethereum mining centralization.
Findings
Existence of relationships between miners beyond pool payouts
Highly connected clusters control significant hashing power
Clusters exhibit relationships opposite to theoretical predictions
Abstract
It is widely accepted that Ethereum mining is highly centralized. Nonetheless, centralization has been mostly characterized by exclusively looking at the influence that independent miners or mining pools can have over the network. Moreover, models of mining behavior assume that miners are either unrelated or only relate via mining pools under highly structured and transparent agreements. If these assumptions and the predictions they entail were to be completely accurate, there would not be any evidence of on-chain transactions between miners, other than the ones expected from mining pool payouts. By looking at on-chain transactions between miners in the Ethereum Network we find that aside from the payouts from mining pools to small miners, there are also transactions that define relationships between mining pools, independent miners and between independent miners and mining pools.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
