Early spectral evolution of classical novae: consistent evidence for multiple distinct outflows
E. Aydi, L. Chomiuk, L. Izzo, E. J. Harvey, J. Leahy-McGregor, J., Strader, D. A. H. Buckley, K. V. Sokolovsky, A. Kawash, C. S. Kochanek, J. D., Linford, B. D. Metzger, K. Mukai, M. Orio, B. J. Shappee, L. Shishkovsky, E., Steinberg, S. J. Swihart, J. L. Sokoloski, F. M. Walter

TL;DR
This study analyzes high-resolution spectra of 12 classical novae, revealing multiple distinct outflows with different velocities, supporting a complex ejection mechanism involving initial mass ejection and subsequent wind interactions.
Contribution
It provides the first consistent spectral evidence for multiple physically distinct outflows during nova eruptions, advancing understanding of nova mass ejection processes.
Findings
Presence of at least two distinct flows: slow initial ejection and fast wind.
Observation of an intermediate-velocity component in high-cadence novae.
Heavy element absorption lines share velocity structure with ejecta, indicating an association.
Abstract
The physical mechanism driving mass ejection during a nova eruption is still poorly understood. Possibilities include ejection in a single ballistic event, a common envelope interaction, a continuous wind, or some combination of these processes. Here we present a study of 12 Galactic novae, for which we have pre-maximum high-resolution spectroscopy. All 12 novae show the same spectral evolution. Before optical peak, they show a slow P Cygni component. After peak a fast component quickly arises, while the slow absorption remains superimposed on top of it, implying the presence of at least two physically distinct flows. For novae with high-cadence monitoring, a third, intermediate-velocity component is also observed. These observations are consistent with a scenario where the slow component is associated with the initial ejection of the accreted material and the fast component with a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
